Thanks for the clarification, aquastorm. Now I got it
Well in fact we believed that to be rather more a service to the customer than a problem, since I guess not everyone would be fine with being publicated on snaping domains?
But I get your point. Basically there doesn´t exist a real reason against publicating the bidders I guess, except for the bidders themselves (in case they don´t want us to do so). So that leads us to a dilemma: Of course we could integrate a function where bidders can authorize us to publicate their name on bidding history, but what if most of the bidders don´t authorize us (which I believe would happen) since they don´t wanna be publicated? I mean that would again lead to mostly anonymous bids and again to the accusation our bids wouldn´t be real... and we are not the type of guys that act against our customers wishes just for us not having to deal with such accusations (which are simply wrong, but understandable)...
I mean I know we don´t do such kinda things, but I get the point - how would you know?
I believe the only reasonable way out of that dilemma will be to give it some time, so that the one or other customer will review us and people have, so to say, an independant point of view on us.
Nevertheless I welcome and will pass on any proposals how to solve the dilemma mentioned above so that catch.info works to your satisfaction.
So if you got any idea on how to solve, just shot