Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av tartareandesire
Sökmotorvänliga url:er har inte några egentliga fördelar gentemot vanliga dynamiska id-url:er i Google idag. Däremot finns det ju andra fördelar.
|
Om en sida är dynamisk så rekomenderar till och med Google att
inte skriva om url'er så att de ser statiska ut.
För att citera Google lite:
Should I try to make my dynamic URLs look static?
It's quite hard to correctly create and maintain rewrites that change dynamic URLs to static-looking URLs.
It's much safer to serve us the original dynamic URL and let us handle the problem of detecting and avoiding problematic parameters.
Which can Googlebot read better, static or dynamic URLs?
While static URLs might have a slight advantage in terms of clickthrough rates because users can easily read the urls, the decision to use database-driven websites does not imply a significant disadvantage in terms of indexing and ranking.
Providing search engines with dynamic URLs should be favored over hiding parameters to make them look static.
Myth: "Dynamic URLs cannot be crawled."
We can crawl dynamic URLs and interpret the different parameters. We might have problems crawling and ranking your dynamic URLs if you try to make your urls look static and in the process hide parameters which offer the Googlebot valuable information. One recommendation is to avoid rewrite a dynamic URL to make it look static.
...we'd advise you to serve us all the parameters in your dynamic URL and our system will figure out which ones do not matter. Hiding your parameters keeps us from analyzing your URLs properly and we won't be able to recognize the parameters as such, which could cause a loss of valuable information.
Does that mean I should avoid rewriting dynamic URLs at all?
That's our recommendation, unless your rewrites are limited to removing unnecessary parameters, or you are very diligent in removing all parameters that could cause problems. If you transform your dynamic URL to make it look static you should be aware that we might not be able to interpret the information correctly in all cases.
källa
Det var Google's syn på dynamiska url'er och rewrites till url'er som ser statiska ut.
Sen finns det ju andra aspekter som CTR o.s.v som du säger.....