Den ser väl ut ungefär så här:

US court in record fine for illegal file-sharing
2007-10-05 - news(punkt)muzi(punkt)com

In the first US trial to challenge the illegal downloading of music on the Internet, a single mother from Minnesota has been ordered to pay 220,000 dollars for sharing 24 songs online.

Jammie Thomas, 30, was the first among more than 26,000 people sued by the world's most powerful recording companies to refuse a settlement after being slapped with a lawsuit by the Recording Industry of America and six major music labels.

She turned down an offer to pay a few thousands dollars in fines and instead took the case to court.

Unlike some who insist on the right to share files over the Internet, Thomas says she was wrongfully targeted by SafeNet, a contractor employed by the recording industry to patrol the Internet for copyrighted material.

Her lawyer said earlier this week that she had racked up some 60,000 dollars in legal fees because she refused to be bullied.

And while Thomas insisted on the courthouse steps that she had never downloaded or uploaded music, her lawyer tried to convince jurors there was no way to prove who had uploaded songs on the Kazaa file sharing network.

A jury took just five hours to decide that evidence provided by the music labels showed otherwise and found Thomas guilty of copyright infringement, court records showed Thursday.

Thomas, an employee of the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe, an Indian tribe, was ordered to pay a 9,250-dollar fine for each of 24 shared songs cited in the case, including Godsmack's "Spiral," Destiny's Child's "Bills, Bills, Bills" and Sara McLachlan's "Building a Mystery."

It could have been a lot worse.

The fine could have reached 150,000 dollars a song if the jury had found "willful" copyright infringement.

Had the record companies sued her for all 1,702 songs found in the online folder the fine could have run in the millions.

WebboT: Åfan :blink:

Det vi diskuterar att det aldrig kan bli olagligt att sprida eller länka torrent filer, om vi skulle sätta lagar på allt som kan användas till något olagligt så skulle allt blivit olagligt även allt från stenar till luft.

Hela denna tråden handlade endast om om torrent filer av olagliga eller om det var olagligt att länka till dom. Inte att det var olagligt sprida vissa filmer på ett visst sätt.

Vi kan sluta spekulera. Utan prejudikat finns det ingen som vet.

Rättsläget oklart eller hur det nu brukar stå..

what he said.
men det hela handlar till viss del om vem som har mest muskler och kan böja lagens ord bäst till sin fördel.
det är ju trots allt bara människor som är nämndemän och de blir påverkade av media och advokaternas historier dom med som alla andra. tyvärr.
så alla dessa reklamfilmer som sänds förändrar människors syn och om nämndemännen/kvinnorna ser dessa filmer ja då påverkar dom på ett "smart" sätt..
proppaganda har alltid fungerat att få med sig många..

Jag har svårt att tro att fallet TPB inte når HD om inte EG-domstolen.

klart det gör. hur det än går kommer motsatta parten föra det vidare.
och vi vet alla att EG domstolen inte är kvicka..
skulle vara om ena parten pushar med sina pengar o makt så EG domstolen tar upp det fort osv.
annars tar det ÅRATAL.